Well I'm not sure I understand your point. Or are all these Freesync buyers just using 1080p? Or much lower detail levels? I'd rather stick to 60Hz and higher quality visuals. Also, the UK site is failing to retain the login credentials from the US transfer as it used to.Ģ0334667 said:It's a bit odd that people are citing the monitor cost advantage of Freesync, while article reviews are not showing games actually running at frame rates which would be relevant to that technology.
When I follow the Forums link, the UK site looks different, then reverts to its more usual layout when one logs in (weird). Maybe they'll vary in steady state for boost clocks, but it kinda wrecks the purpose of their marketing names. SC for EVGA, AMP for Zotac, etc., but of course they're all 1607MHz base. One thing which is kinda nuts though, the AIB versions of the 1070 Ti are using the same branding names as they do for what are normally overclocked models, eg.
Re pricing, Scan here in the UK has the Vega 56 a bit cheaper than a reference 1070 Ti, but not by much. Not sure if it's significant, but I also see 10 Ti performance at 1440p being a bit better back in March. Chris, what is it that pummels the minimums for the 1080 Ti and Vega 64 in BF1 at 1440p? And why, when moving up to UHD, does this effect persist for the 1080 Ti but not for Vega 64?Īlso, wrt the testing of Division, and comparing to your 1080 Ti review back in March, I notice the results for the 1070 are identical at 1440p (58.7), but completely different at UHD (42.7 in March, 32.7 now) what has changed? This new test states it's using Medium detail at UHD, so was the March testing using Ultra or something? The other cards are affected in the same way.
0 kommentar(er)
